Land Sale with Right of Redemption Dispute in Thailand: What Should You Do?
Trying to sell your land for debt repayment, but ending up in a sale-with-redemption contract and at risk of losing the whole plot? This case study explains the chronology, the money reconciliation, and the legal issues to examine before acting
This case study is adapted from one complainant’s allegations, with fictional details replacing identifying information. Everything on this page is a one-sided account, not judicial findings, and no one is confirmed to have committed any offence. Original documents and the explanations of all involved parties must be examined before any of this is used in actual proceedings
The complainant owned a plot of land and intended to sell it to repay debt. A person introduced as a broker offered to find a buyer, but events led to a sale with right of redemption instead of an outright sale; the money received did not match the figures cited; money was transferred back to the broker several times; and as the redemption deadline approached, the funds to redeem were still missing. The questions are where to begin examining the evidence, and whether this is a criminal matter or a contractual dispute
Who This Page Is For
- Landowners considering or already in a sale-with-redemption arrangement
- People persuaded by intermediaries to switch from a sale to a redemption contract
- Those approaching a redemption deadline who do not know what rights remain
- Anyone who suspects their land transaction involved deception
Chronology as alleged (January 2025 – September 2026)
The complainant wished to sell land at about THB 650,000 per rai, a stated total of about THB 4,200,000. A relative introduced a person claiming to be a land broker
The alleged broker advertised the land with photographs and documents in a Facebook group; a 3% brokerage fee and any excess over the asking price were discussed
The broker stated that a senior military officer wished to buy the whole plot — a buyer the complainant never met — and proposed a sale with right of redemption as interim financing
The complainant received THB 1,250,100 from a person introduced by the broker, and Land Office proceedings followed with a registered redemption price of THB 2,053,000 (a separately mentioned THB 2,949,900 does not align and must be traced — possibly to the THB 4,200,000 asking price)
The complainant claims a remaining THB 858,900 was due, and accepted a THB 61,590 brokerage fee, but received only THB 507,233, raising questions about the deductions
The complainant transferred THB 230,000 back to the alleged broker across eleven transactions, citing claims about price differentials and finding a buyer
A further THB 70,000 was transferred in two transactions, described as a deposit toward redemption or repurchase on the broker’s advice
A copy of the sale-with-redemption agreement arrived by post; the complainant contacted the redemption buyer about extending the period
The complainant reports paying THB 99,000 for three extension periods, with extension letters and payment records that require review
The date the complainant understood to be the redemption deadline, with the redemption money still unavailable. Whether the redemption right has actually expired cannot yet be concluded: the registered dates, the contractual period, statutory notices, extensions, land type, and applicable protective legislation must all be examined
Financial summary: alleged vs calculated figures
| Item | As alleged | As calculated | What must be verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registered redemption price (as cited) | THB 2,053,000 | — | Verify against the contract and the Land Office registration record |
| Funds received before registration (as cited) | THB 1,250,100 | — | Verify transfer slips and bank statements |
| Remaining amount as alleged | THB 858,900 | 2,053,000 − 1,250,100 = THB 802,900 | A THB 56,000 gap that documents must explain |
| Other referenced amount | THB 2,949,900 | — | Origin unclear; trace whether it relates to the THB 4,200,000 asking price or another transaction |
| Agreed brokerage fee (as cited) | THB 61,590 | 3% of 2,053,000 = THB 61,590 | Figures match, but verify what base the agreement actually used |
| Amount actually received that day (as cited) | THB 507,233 | — | Request a full schedule of deductions with supporting documents |
| Transfers back to the broker (as cited) | THB 230,000 (11 transfers) | — | Examine the stated reason for each transfer and its link to the allegations |
| Redemption deposit (as cited) | THB 70,000 (2 transfers) | — | Examine the true purpose and whether receipts exist |
| Extension fees (as cited) | THB 99,000 (3 payments) | — | Examine the extension letters and payment records |
This table compares figures as alleged against figures as calculated, to show exactly where documents must reconcile the numbers. Nothing here is confirmed, and these amounts must not be presented as proven losses
Legal issues to be examined
Civil: the redemption contract
A sale with right of redemption of immovable property under the Civil and Commercial Code (ss. 491–502) must be made in writing and registered with the Land Office; s. 494 limits the exercise of the redemption right in time. Once the period duly expires the right ends — but expiry must be assessed together with statutory notices, extensions, and any deposit of the redemption money under specific legislation
Civil: specific protective legislation
If the land is for agriculture or residence and the seller is a natural person, the Act Protecting People in the Making of Land Sale with Right of Redemption Contracts for Agriculture or Residence B.E. 2562 (2019) may apply, governing contract conditions, the redemption period, written warning before termination of the right, and the deposit of redemption money. Whether it applies here is the first issue to determine
Criminal: fraud or breach of contract?
Fraud (Penal Code, s. 341) requires deception by false statements or concealment, intent not to perform from the start, and property obtained through the victim’s induced belief. Breach of contract by a party who intended to perform is not automatically criminal. Each transfer back to the broker must be examined: induced by false statements, or made willingly under an agreement?
Criminal: complaint deadline
Certain offences are private wrongs requiring a complaint within 3 months from knowing of the offence and the offender (Penal Code, s. 96). Establishing when the complainant “knew” is therefore critical to whether the right can still be exercised
Matters still to be proven
No conclusion of guilt can be drawn. The roles of each recipient of transfers, whether the alleged broker was a mere introducer or a beneficiary, and whether the land document is a Chanote title deed, a Nor Sor 3 Gor, or another instrument (which must not be used interchangeably) all require examination of the originals
Caution
Knowingly making a false report is itself an offence. The matter should therefore begin with a full factual and documentary review, with civil proceedings considered in parallel to protect the land rights, as appropriate
Nine categories of evidence to gather
Nine categories of evidence to gather before meeting a lawyer or the inquiry officer (you do not need all of them to start a consultation — bring what you have):
Land title documents
The title deed or other land-rights document (identify its exact type) with a copy of the owner’s ID card
Complaint or daily police record
If the matter was reported earlier, to link events and dates
Sale advertisement
Screenshots of the Facebook group post used by the broker, with dates and account names
LINE conversations
Complete chats with the broker and related parties — uncut and undeleted — with timestamps and sender names
Transfer records
Slips and bank statements for every transaction, incoming and outgoing, including PromptPay
Land Office documents
Application receipts, registration records, and documents from the 19 June 2025 transaction
The redemption contract
The copy received by post, together with the envelope showing the posting date
Extension documents
Every extension agreement, with evidence of the THB 99,000 extension payments
Chronology record
The complainant’s own timeline, annotated with which document supports each entry, for cross-checking against the financial table
Common concerns and practical responses
We agreed to sell the land — so why did it become a sale with redemption?
An outright sale transfers ownership for the full price at once; a sale with redemption lets the seller buy the property back within a period, must be registered, and binds the parties to the contract terms. The difference affects both the money received immediately and the rights that remain, so the contract must be read closely: in what capacity was it signed, and on what terms
The money received does not match the stated figures. What now?
Reconcile from the actual documents: the registered THB 2,053,000 less the THB 1,250,100 received earlier equals THB 802,900 — THB 56,000 below the alleged THB 858,900. Use every slip, receipt, and deduction schedule to find documents that explain the difference before taking further steps
The redemption deadline is near but the money is not there. Is the land lost immediately?
Not yet conclusive. Check the registered date and the contractual period, whether statutory warning notices were given, what the extensions provide, and — if the land is agricultural or residential and the seller a natural person — the protections that may apply, including depositing the redemption money through the proper procedure. The rights that remain can only be determined from the documents
The person who arranged everything received extra payments several times. Is this fraud?
Criminal fraud requires its legal elements to be proven from evidence, not merely loss or breach. Examine each transfer: was there a false statement, did the recipient know it was false, and was the transfer induced by that belief or made willingly? If the elements are absent, the matter may be purely civil
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a failed land deal or unpaid money automatically fraud?
No. The law separates breach of contract (civil) from fraud (criminal), asking whether there was deception from the start. Losing money in a transaction does not by itself mean a criminal offence occurred
Can I file a police complaint, and where?
If the documents give reasonable cause to believe deception occurred, a complaint may be filed with the inquiry officer — but knowingly false reporting is itself an offence, so the evidence should be reviewed first
I already signed the redemption contract. What options remain?
It depends on the contract and the actual status of the rights: redemption within the period, negotiating an extension, reviewing the validity of the registration, and — if deception is established — both civil and criminal measures, assessed case by case
Can the land still be redeemed?
That requires examining the registered redemption period, warning notices, all extensions, any applicable protective legislation, and the proper procedure for depositing redemption money. It cannot be answered from memory or feeling alone
What documents should I bring to a lawyer?
Whatever you have of the nine categories above — especially the redemption contract, all transfer records, conversations, and Land Office documents. The lawyer will begin by reconciling the figures and reviewing the contract terms
Evidence-First Legal Case Assessment
Our working approach: the facts, documents, and available evidence are reviewed first, so that the proposed strategy fits the law and the evidence of each matter. This is a working method, not a promise of outcomes
Our Lawyers
Provides legal services and handles engagements within the framework of the legal profession, giving consideration to the issues and facts of each matter
View lawyer profile ↗Before Engaging Us, Please Note
- An initial inquiry begins with the type of matter and the date of the incident
- A preliminary opinion may require additional documents before a course of action can be proposed
- Scope of work, fees, and timeline are put in writing before work begins
- The firm does not guarantee case outcomes, which depend on the facts and the lawful discretion of the courts and authorities
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense & Litigation · Civil Litigation · Business & Contract Law · Contact